A peep into Piers Morgan's diary:
The towers were gone, crumbled to a layer of powdery dust now covering most of the tip of Manhattan. The Pentagon was burning. It was just unbelievable horror. Fifty thousand people work in those towers, and nobody was sure how many were dead, but it would definitely be in the thousands.
It was one of those news days when only one image would make every front page - that of both towers drenched in a fireball of flame. We wiped the front for it, with the simple headline WAR ON THE WORLD.
At 8pm I noticed the Arsenal match was running on one of the TV screens in the newsroom. I'd forgotten all about it.
"Turn it up a bit," I said."
"Piers, I don't think this is the right time to be watching football, do you?" said Jon, quietly.
"I felt suddenly very embarrassed. "No, you're right. Thanks."
Every editor needs a few people around him to tell him he's being an arse from time to time.
The more I think about it, the more I suspect that, in fact, quite a lot of people in Britain reacted in a similar way. I'm not talking about media-land either; I mean Middle England. That was my experience, at least, as I've mentioned before. Horror, yes, but the horror of witnessing that ultimate cliché, "a real-life disaster movie". A lot of friends, acquaintances and strangers I spoke to in the days that followed were curiously detached from the whole event. Not simply out of shock, but because, deep down, they didn't regard it as "our" problem. I found that very disturbing. Americans saw the attack, rightly, as another Pearl Harbour. Over here, for many, it was, well, something to watch over and over on TV. How long was it before I overheard the standard comment that, you know, more Americans die on the roads in a year than perished in the towers? How long? A day or two. That's all.
And now, of course, the real life disaster movie has been turned into a real disaster movie: www.apple.com/trailers/universal/flight93/large.html
Is that post-modern, or post-ironic, or something else?
Posted by: Robert | Monday, January 23, 2006 at 12:18 PM
Clive, I was in Washington during 9-11, an eerie quiet day, only broken by the sound of fighter jets. But curiously, I also had a desire to both suck in information and escape it, especially the incessant reruns of the towers falling, all spectacle and no context. The pictures became a kind of emotional marker for what was happening, experienced again and again. I didn't crave football, but didn't crave the constant closed loop of the experience either.... Maybe this is where art comes in, to help us process what the news can only show, not make sense of.
By the way Clive, this is Sam, from NYC jazz days circa 1990s. Just found your blog by happenstance by way of another one, Sam
Posted by: Samuel Fromartz | Monday, January 23, 2006 at 04:22 PM
I recall reading in Admiral Dan Gallery's memoirs, that when he was Assistant Naval Attache in London his Royal Navy hosts were sincerely sympathetic about the US losses at Pearl Harbor, but also somewhat smug because after all, the US was caught unprepared and such a debacle would never have happened to the RN. A few weeks later, he wrote, that all changed when HMS Repulse and Prince of Wales were caught without air cover and sunk off Malaya.
I suppose for many outside the US, 9/11 seemed horrific but distant, and perhaps the sort of thing you'd expect to happen to Americans. I don't find that attitude inexplicable, but what infuriated me were those Americans who immediately, as bodies were still being pulled from the debris, loudly and stupidly were claiming the attacks were our own fault and that they would never have happened if Bush hadn't... done whatever their own silly pet peeve was.
So don't be apologetic for your temporary withdrawal from the shock. Some of my own countrymen were secretly gleeful (some not secretly at all) that it had happened because it "proved" that they were right and the rest of us were stupid barbarians. And then there were those Americans who went so far as to state that the victims deserved to die because of where they were working or what their jobs had been. Of course, one prominent specimen bewailed the deaths as having occurred in Blue States and therefore undeserving since they hadn't voted for Bush.
Posted by: Steve Skubinna | Tuesday, January 24, 2006 at 12:45 AM
I had a totally different experience of this, due to the industry I was in. I had just qualified as a commercial pilot and was in the commercial flight training industry. The shock was huge and very real, all encompassing. It was not just the immediate reduction in our prospects, but the brutal loss of innocence. The industry is, for the most part, so incredibly tolerant, open and cosmopolitan. This was so alien to us, yet we had been used for this terrible purpose. It also robbed us of a large part of the fun anticipated in flying a jet airliner; I now fly a light aircraft for charter, adn much prefer this as you meet customers the big boys are no longer allowed to mix with. It also ended up destroying my very important relationship, a fact I could foresee at the time; with jobs hard to come by I assume I was not alone in this.
The impact was huge and, psychologically, immediate to most of the people I knew.
Posted by: Richard | Saturday, January 28, 2006 at 06:18 PM